Stars · music
Re:Scene Topped BTS and BLACKPINK in a Reputation Index. English Wikipedia Barely Noticed.
The Korea Corporate Reputation Institute ranked girl group Re:Scene first among K-pop groups for September 2026, ahead of BTS and BLACKPINK. Their English Wikipedia page averaged 11 views a day over the same 30 days.
The table this is written from: /what-moves-english-reading
The Korea Corporate Reputation Institute’s monthly brand reputation ranking for September 2026 put girl group Re:Scene first among all K-pop groups — ahead of BTS in second place and BLACKPINK in third. Re:Scene’s individual members also took the top spots in the institute’s rookie-idol ranking, sweeping the top five places, according to STARNEWS.
We don’t reproduce that index’s score here — it’s a third-party measurement built from Korean-language media and community mentions, and we don’t redistribute numbers we haven’t verified ourselves. What we can measure is how often people looked Re:Scene up on English Wikipedia over the same period.
What we measured
We pulled daily English Wikipedia pageviews for Re:Scene and, as a reference point, for BTS — the group the reputation index placed just behind them — over the 29 days ending 17 September 2026.
| 29-day average | Highest day | Lowest day | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Scene | 11 | 19 | 4 |
| BTS | 6,860 | 10,382 | 4,923 |
Re:Scene’s English Wikipedia readership averaged 11 views a day across the entire window. BTS, the group the reputation index ranked one place below Re:Scene, averaged 6,860 views a day — 624x that.
What this does and doesn’t show
A reputation index built for a Korean audience, from Korean-language sources, can be a real and accurate read of who a domestic audience is talking about most right now — a debut-era rookie group riding a wave of local media coverage can genuinely outscore a group with over a decade of global reach on that specific measure. That’s not a contradiction with our numbers; it’s a different question answered by a different instrument, pointed at a different readership.
What our count says is narrower: as of mid-September 2026, Re:Scene has not yet become a name that English-speaking readers look up in meaningful numbers. Whether that changes is not something a 29-day window can tell us.
Our running method for checking what actually moves English Wikipedia reading is on what-moves-english-reading.
Where these numbers come from
Sources
- STARNEWS — News report, '1st Re:Scene, 2nd BTS, 3rd BLACKPINK,' 2026-09-16 · https://www.starnewskorea.com/music/2026/09/16/2026091606475913935
- K Trendy News — News report, 'Re:Scene tops September 2026 rookie idol brand reputation, Cortis and QWER follow,' 2026-09 · https://www.k-trendynews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=205054
- Wikimedia Foundation — Pageviews API — Daily English Wikipedia pageviews, all-access, user agents only, for Re:Scene and BTS, 20 August-17 September 2026 · https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/
What we checked
- The Korea Corporate Reputation Institute's brand reputation index (a third-party score we do not reproduce here) placed Re:Scene first among K-pop groups for September 2026, with BTS second and BLACKPINK third. Re:Scene members also swept the top individual idol spots.
- Over the 29 days we measured (20 August-17 September 2026), Re:Scene's English Wikipedia page averaged 11 views a day. The single highest day was 19 views; the lowest was 4.
- BTS's English Wikipedia page averaged 6,860 views a day over the same window — about 624 times Re:Scene's average.
What we left out, and why
- The brand reputation index's own methodology or score. We report only that the ranking exists and who topped it — the number itself is a third-party measurement we have not verified and do not redistribute.
- Any claim that Re:Scene is less successful than the ranking suggests inside Korea. Reputation indices built from Korean-language media and community mentions can be entirely accurate for a domestic audience while an English-language readership measure shows something else.
- A prediction about whether Re:Scene's English-language readership will grow. We report the 29-day window we measured, not a trend forecast.
The data behind this
Written from the same data
Take this away — 10 cards
The figures in this article, as images. Free to repost with the address on them.
If you work in this business
Everything on this page is measured from the same weekly Netflix lists, per market and per title. We publish the pages free; what we sell is the same measurement cut to one company's catalogue — including the figures behind /what-moves-english-reading.
What a company sheet contains, and what it cannot tell you →
What do you make of this?
We counted it. What it means is yours to decide.