Korean pop culture, in numbers

Industry · esports

Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK

Over the first two Swiss days, the Chinese article on Worlds 2026 drew 1.8 times the English one. Gen.G's Korean page drew 5 of 2,056 reads. CTBC Flying Oyster, from Taiwan, was the most-read team: 6,678.

The table this is written from: /worlds-2026

#worlds-2026#league-of-legends#lck#gen-g#t1#dplus-kia#hanwha-life#ctbc-flying-oyster#wikipedia#esports

Who is reading about the 2026 World Championship? Wikipedia counts its readers by language, so we added up the first two days of the Swiss Stage, Korean-time 24 and 25 October, which are UTC days 23 and 24.

The tournament article: Chinese first

Edition 23 Oct 24 Oct Two days
Chinese 7,473 11,244 18,717
English 4,951 5,295 10,246
Spanish 595 730 1,325
Vietnamese 196 185 381

The Chinese article drew 1.8 times the English one. On 16 October, the first day of the play-ins, the two were close: 4,747 against 4,365. Only these four editions had an article on the tournament.

The LCK’s four teams, by language

Team Reads, all editions Most-read edition Korean edition
T1 4,472 English, 40.5% 43 (1.0%)
Gen.G 2,056 Chinese, 38.1% 5 (0.2%)
Dplus Kia 1,365 Chinese, 29.0% 38 (2.8%)
Hanwha Life 1,208 English, 35.0% 75 (6.2%)

Over two days in which Gen.G won twice, Gen.G’s Korean Wikipedia article was read five times. French readers looked up every LCK team more than Korean readers did: 13% to 23% of each team’s reads came from the French edition.

This does not mean Korea is not watching. Korean fans mostly use Namuwiki, a separate Korean wiki that publishes no reading counts. What Wikipedia measures here is the world outside Korea looking Korean teams up, mostly in Chinese, English and French.

The most-read team was from Taiwan

CTBC Flying Oyster, from the LCP (Taiwan, Vietnam and the wider Asia-Pacific), drew 6,678 reads over the two days, more than T1. Its usual day is about 152. On 24 October alone it drew 4,631, and 72% of the two days’ reads came from the Chinese edition, which serves readers in Taiwan as well as elsewhere. We did not check what drove that day. CTBC Flying Oyster play T1 at 02:00 KST on 27 October.

What this does and does not say

Wikipedia reads count look-ups, not viewers. They say nothing about broadcast audiences or which team has more fans. Three teams could not be measured at all: LYON and LOS have no English Wikipedia article, and Team Secret Whales sit under a parent article that covers many games. Each team’s full row is on our Worlds 2026 page.

Wikipedia pageviews (Wikimedia REST API), user traffic, daily. Match times from Riot Games’ official LoL Esports schedule.

Where these numbers come from

Sources

  • Wikimedia — Pageviews per-article, user traffic only (bots excluded), daily, 1–24 October 2026: the article '2026 League of Legends World Championship' in every edition linked from English Wikipedia (Chinese, English, Spanish, Vietnamese), and the articles of 13 of the 16 Swiss Stage teams in every linked edition. · https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/
  • Riot Games (LoL Esports schedule) — Swiss Stage round one (24 Oct 2026, 02:00–09:00 KST) and round two (25 Oct, 02:00–09:00 KST), which fall on UTC days 23 and 24 October. · https://lolesports.com/en-US/schedule

What we checked

  • Tournament article, UTC 23 + 24 Oct: Chinese 7,473 + 11,244 = 18,717; English 4,951 + 5,295 = 10,246; Spanish 595 + 730 = 1,325; Vietnamese 196 + 185 = 381. On 16 Oct, the first play-in day: Chinese 4,747, English 4,365.
  • Team articles, all editions, UTC 23 + 24 Oct, with Korean edition: T1 4,472 (Korean 43, 1.0%); Gen.G 2,056 (5, 0.2%); Dplus Kia 1,365 (38, 2.8%); Hanwha Life 1,208 (75, 6.2%).
  • CTBC Flying Oyster: 6,678 over the two days (Chinese 4,825, 72.3%; English 1,853), against a usual 152 a day (median of 1–13 Oct, both editions). 24 Oct alone: 4,631.
  • French share of the four LCK teams' reads: Hanwha Life 23.2%, Dplus Kia 20.7%, Gen.G 14.7%, T1 13.5%.

What we left out, and why

  • LYON and LOS, which had no English Wikipedia article on 26 October, and Team Secret Whales, whose parent article covers many games. Not measured, not zero.
  • Namuwiki, where most Korean readers look teams up. It publishes no reading counts.
  • 25 October onward, not yet published by Wikimedia when we wrote.
  • Why CTBC Flying Oyster's reading jumped on 24 October. We did not check.

The data behind this

Written from the same data

Take this away — 10 cards

The figures in this article, as images. Free to repost with the address on them.

Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — card 1 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — card 2 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — card 3 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — card 4 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — card 5 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — tall card 1 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — tall card 2 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — tall card 3 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — tall card 4 of 5Worlds 2026 on Wikipedia: Chinese Readers 18,717, English 10,246. Korean Wikipedia Barely Reads the LCK — tall card 5 of 5

If you work in this business

Everything on this page is measured from the same weekly Netflix lists, per market and per title. We publish the pages free; what we sell is the same measurement cut to one company's catalogue — including the figures behind /worlds-2026.

What a company sheet contains, and what it cannot tell you →

What do you make of this?

We counted it. What it means is yours to decide.

← All 312 articlesFront page