Korean pop culture, in numbers

January is when a K-pop act is read most. September is when it is not

Every Korean act has one month when more people looked it up on English Wikipedia than in any other. We know that month for 774 acts. Sorted by calendar month, they are not spread evenly: 94 peaked in January and only 38 in September.

What was counted

Korean acts whose best-read month we know774
Acts dropped for too few months — not counted as zero0
Of those, peaks of 50,000 reads or more100
Months in the window4,080 days
Calendar months more than two SD from expectation5 of 12

Why this needs a correction before you read it

February has 28 days. A short month collects fewer reads, so it is less likely to hold an act's best month for reasons that have nothing to do with music. Our window also starts in July, so July and August appear one more time than the other months. Both effects are corrected below, and the day counts are printed so you can check the arithmetic. Without the correction February would read as 59% of expectation; with it, 64%.

The month each act was read most, all 774 of them

Expectation is proportional to the days each calendar month contributes to 2015-07 ~ 2026-08. Standard deviations are shown only because the sample passes 30 acts.
MonthActsDays in windowExpectedOf expectedSD
January9434164.7145%3.64
February383115964%-2.73
March8034164.7124%1.9
April8933062.6142%3.34
May5934164.791%-0.71
June6333062.6101%0.05
July8737270.6123%1.96
August7637270.6108%0.65
September3833062.661%-3.11
October5134164.779%-1.7
November4333062.669%-2.48
December5634164.787%-1.08

5 of the twelve months sit more than two standard deviations from expectation — January (high), April (high), September (low), February (low) and November (low). That is the finding. The middle of the table is unremarkable, and we say so rather than dressing it up.

The 100 biggest peaks, and the month that never wins

Restricted to the 100 acts whose best month drew at least 50,000 reads, so that a small article having a noisy month cannot drive the pattern. Among those hundred, not one peaked in February — against an expectation of 7.6.

MonthActsExpectedSD
January118.40.91
February07.6-2.76
March118.40.91
April138.11.73
May118.40.91
June118.11.02
July119.10.62
August69.1-1.03
September48.1-1.44
October88.4-0.12
November68.1-0.73
December88.4-0.12

The pattern is weaker here than in the full set. Whatever produces it works mostly on acts that are read in the thousands, not the hundreds of thousands — and that is worth saying plainly, because the opposite would have been the more quotable result.

What this is not

This is not about when comebacks happen. We measured the month an act was read most, and we do not hold release dates.

This is looking something up, not listening to it.

Acts whose best month we could not determine are counted separately, never filled in as zero.

A calendar month with more days in the window collects more reads, so it is more likely to hold an act’s peak. The expectation below corrects for that.

In particular: we do not hold release dates. If you want to read this as “release in January”, that is a different claim about data we did not collect.

Where else this leads

The same 774 acts lose half of that peak within two months of reaching it, and the median act takes two years after debut to get there. Korean titles halve on the same two-month timescale. Birthdays run on a different calendar again — July is the thinnest month for K-pop birthdays, which is not the month that shows up here.

What we wrote from this data

Sources

Wikimedia Pageviews REST API (English Wikipedia, all-access, agent=user, monthly), acts from Wikidata SPARQL. Re-counted from kcw-group-afterlife.json — no new collection. Window 2015-07 ~ 2026-08; the current month is excluded because it is unfinished. Re-counted 13 September 2026, 18:25 KST.