Korean pop culture, in numbers

Southeast Asia does not read brands as one thing

Does it change anything to split brands by kind instead of ranking them together?

Yes. Indonesia sits 1st in one kind and 4th in another. Read as one lump, that disappears.

Five kinds, and where each one is read

reads per million reads of that edition (백만분율). Reading is divided by the size of each Wikipedia edition, so a country with fewer readers is not pushed to the bottom for being small. Window — 2025-08 through 2026-07, 12 months, human traffic only. A brand enters a kind's total only if it has an article in all four editions; brands missing one are shown in the panel but left out of the sum, because counting a missing article as zero would make an encyclopaedia gap look like disinterest.

KindBrandsCountedIndonesiaVietnamThailandMalaysiaRead most in
Luxury houses10738.4578.5361.4686.3Malaysia
German car makers3353.7951.0943.1417.32Indonesia
Jewellers and watchmakers4411.1113.9816.311.91Thailand
Korean car makers ⚠ thin316.210.722.863.35Vietnam
Everyday fashion labels ⚠ thin212.753.511.431.06Vietnam

⚠ A kind holding fewer than 3 brands is too thin to call a pattern. It is shown so the panel is complete, and marked so it is not read as one. The thin kinds here are Korean car makers and Everyday fashion labels.

The same country changes place depending on the kind

Indonesia sits 4, 1, 4 across the kinds that are thick enough to read — first in one, last in another. That is the whole point of splitting them. A single ranking of 22 brands would have given Indonesia one position and hidden the rest.

This is not a statement that one country cares more than another. It says the four countries are interested in different kinds of thing, and a page that ranks brands together cannot show that.

The car comparison we could not make

We set out to put the BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche total against Genesis Motor, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia. We are not publishing a multiple. Only 1 of the 3 Korean marques has an article in all four editions. Hyundai has none in the Thai Wikipedia, and Genesis has one only in Indonesian. Putting a one-marque total against a three-marque total would not be a comparison between kinds; it would be a comparison between how many articles happen to exist. So no multiple is given here.

The gap that stopped the comparison is itself the thing worth reporting: the Thai Wikipedia has an article on BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Porsche, and none on Hyundai.

⛔ This is how often an encyclopaedia article is opened, not how many cars are sold. We hold no sales figures here, so this page says nothing about who buys what, and a missing article is not a missing market. A marque with a century of motorsport carries model-by-model articles that a reader falls into; that alone can move reading without moving a single sale.

What this page cannot tell you

Wikidata records no ambassador or endorsement relation between people and brands. We checked and found none in use. So this cannot say who fronts which house. It measures how much a brand is read about, next to how much a person is read about, on one scale.

Measured: 22 brands. Source — Wikimedia Pageviews API, human traffic only; brand identity from Wikidata. Countries: Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia.

Card set — free to share

Five cards, 1080×1350. Every figure on them is in the table on this page. Take them.

Card 1 of 5Card 2 of 5Card 3 of 5Card 4 of 5Card 5 of 5

What we wrote from this data